idljSection: User Commands (1)Updated: 10 March 2001 |
idljSection: User Commands (1)Updated: 10 March 2001 |
idlj generates Java bindings from a given IDL file.
where idl-file is the name of a file containing Interface Definition Language (IDL) definitions. Options may appear in any order, but must precede the idl-file.
idlj My.idl
This generates the client-side bindings and is equivalent to:
idlj -fclient My.idl
The client-side bindings do not include the server-side skeleton. If you want to generate the server-side bindings for the interfaces:
idlj -fserver My.idl
Server-side bindings include the client-side bindings plus the skeleton, all of which are POA (that is, Inheritance Model) classes. If you want to generate both client and server-side bindings, use one of the following (equivalent) commands:
idlj -fclient -fserver My.idl
idlj -fall My.idl
There are two possible server-side models: the Inneritance Model and the Tie Model.
NEW in 1.4! The default server-side model is the Portable Servant Inheritance Model. Given an interface My defined in My.idl, the file MyPOA.java is generated. You must provide the implementation for My and it must inherit from MyPOA.
MyPOA.java is a stream-based skeleton that extends org.omg.PortableServer.Servant and implements the InvokeHandler interface and the operations interface associated with the IDL interface the skeleton implements.
The PortableServer module for the PortableObjectAdapter (POA) defines the native Servant type. In the Java programming language, the Servant type is mapped to the Java org.omg.PortableServer.Servant class. It serves as the base class for all POA servant implementations and provides a number of methods that may be invoked by the application programmer, as well as methods which are invoked by the POA itself and may be overridden by the user to control aspects of servant behavior.
Another option for the Inheritance Model is to use the -oldImplBase flag in order to generate server-side bindings that are compatible with older version of the Java programming language (prior to J2SE 1.4). To generate server-side bindings that are backwards compatible:
idlj -fclient -fserver -oldImplBase My.idl
idlj -fall -oldImplBase My.idl
Given an interface My defined in My.idl, the file _MyImpleBase.java is generated. You must provide the implementation for My and it must inherit from _MyImplBase.
The other server-side model is called the Tie Model. This is a delegation model. Because it is not possible to generate ties and skeletons at the same time, they must be generated separately. The following commands generate the bindings for the Tie Model:
idlj -fall My.idl
idlj -fallTIE My.idl
For the interface My, the second command generates MyPOATie.java. The constructor to MyPOATie takes a delegate. You must provide the implementation for delegate, but it does not have to inherit from any other class, only the interface MyOperations. But to use it with the ORB, you must wrap your implementation within MyPOATie. For instance:
MyImpl myImpl = new MyImpl ();
My POATie tie = new MyPOATie (myImpl);
orb.connect (tie);
You might want to use the Tie model instead of the typical Inheritance model if your implementation must inherit from some other implementation. Java allows any number of interface inheritance, but there is only one slot for class inheritance. If you the inheritance model, that slot is used up . By using the Tie Model, that slot is freed up for your own use. The drawback is that it introduces a level of indirection: one extra method call occurs when invoking a method.
To generate server-side, Tie model bindings that are compatible with older version of the IDL to Java language mapping in versions of J2SE before 1.4.
idlj -oldImplBase -fall My.idl
idlj -oldImplBase -fallTIE My.idl
For the interface My, this will generate My_Tie.java. The constructor to My_Tie takes a impl. You must provide the implementation for impl, but it does not have to inherit from any other class, only the interface HelloOperations. But to use it with the ORB, you must wrap your implementation within My_Tie. For instance:
MyImpl myImpl = new MyImpl ();
My_Tie tie = new My_Tie (myImpl);
orb.connect (tie);
idlj -td /altdir My.idl
For the interface My, the bindings will be emitted to /altdir/My.java, etc., instead of ./My.java.
idlj -i /includes My.idl
If My.idl also included Another.idl that resided in /moreIncludes, for example, then you would invoke the compiler with the following command:
idlj -i /includes -i /moreIncludes My.idl
Since this form of include can become irritatingly long, another means of indicating to the compiler where to search for included files is provided. This technique is similar to the idea of an environment variable. Create a file named idl.config in a directory that is listed in your CLASSPATH. Inside of idl.config, provide a line with the following form:
includes=/includes;/moreIncludes
The compiler will find this file and read in the includes list. Note that in this example the separator character between the two directories is a semicolon (;). This separator character is platform dependent. On NT it is a semicolon, on Solaris it is a colon, etc. For more information on includes, read the CLASSPATH documentation.
The following command will only generate the java bindings for My:
idlj My.idl
To generate all of the types in My.idl and all of the types in the files that My.idl includes (in this example, MyOther.idl), use the following command:
idlj -emitAll My.idl
There is a caveat to the default rule. #include statements which appear at global scope are treated as described. These #include statements can be thought of as import statements. #include statements which appear within some enclosing scope are treated as true #include statements, meaning that the code within the included file is treated as if it appeared in the original file and, therefore, Java bindings are emitted for it. Here is an example:
Running the following command:
idlj My.idl
will generate the following list of Java files:
Notice that MyOther.java was not generated because it is defined in an import-like #include. But E.java was generated because it was defined in a true #include. Also notice that since Embedded.idl was included within the scope of the interface My, it appears within the scope of My (that is,in MyPackage).
If the -emitAll flag had been used in the previous example, then all types in all included files would be emitted.
Running this file through the IDL-to-Java compiler will place the Java bindings for W1 and W2 within the package Widgets. But there is an industry convention that states that a company's packages should reside within a package named com.<companyname>. The Widgets package is not good enough. To follow convention, it should be com.abc.Widgets. To place this package prefix onto the Widgets module, execute the following:
idlj -pkgPrefix Widgets com.abc Widgets.idl
If you have an IDL file which includes Widgets.idl, the -pkgPrefix flag must appear in that command also. If it does not, then your IDL file will be looking for a Widgets package rather than a com.abc.Widgets package.
If you have a number of these packages that require prefixes, it might be easier to place them into the idl.config file described above. Each package prefix line should be of the form:
PkgPrefix.<type>=<prefix>
So the line for the above example would be:
PkgPrefix.Widgets=com.abc
The use of this options does not affect the Repository ID.
idlj -d MYDEF My.idl
is the equivalent of putting the line #define MYDEF inside My.idl.
idlj -keep My.idl
emit all client-side bindings that do not already exist.
idlj -v My.idl
By default the compiler does not operate in verbose mode.
idlj -version
Version information also appears within the bindings generated by the compiler. Any additional options appearing on the command-line are ignored.
#define symbol
Any attempt to translate these packages will result in uncompilable code, and the use of these packages as the first argument after -pkgTranslate will be treated as an error.
See the Description section for more option information.